Thursday, February 21, 2013

Where the Money Goes: The World of Global Finance


The WB, the WTO, the GATT, the IMF. Four acronyms that together hold more power than most governments on earth. Together, they have represented the face of international finance and Western/American financial interests for the last 70 years. But what are these organizations? What is global finance, and what does it do? And most importantly, why does it matter to you?

Let’s start with a bit of history. Our story begins with the fall of Berlin and the end of World War II. Eastern Europe was a wreck, after having spent most of their accrued wealth recovering from the first World War only to be obliterated once again. They were in desperate need of loans to assist in the development of infrastructure, and with most of the world either financially crippled, physically destroyed or both, the United States emerged as the only country with an economy capable of supporting the necessary loans. This led to the creation of GATT, or the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in 1948, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1944. 

These institutions had very different purposes at the time; the GATT, negotiated by the UN, was to regulate the trade between countries and protect countries from exploitation, both preventing and punishing. The IMF on the other hand, was a collaboration of 44 countries who each contributed to a central fund which could be used for loans to developing and recovering countries. It also oversaw a countries ability to repay loans and could help to stabilize fluctuating currencies and aid in economic growth, generally through the provision of loans. This led to an enormous amount of debt being held by recovering countries and, later on, developing countries.
So why does this matter to you? Keep reading to understand what’s up with Global Finance!
           
WE

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Fire From the Sky: What Israel's Syrian Strike Means to the World; Part 2


The bombing has become one of the most discussed events lately, as the first instance of foreign military intervention within the civil war. Every group seems to have their own opinion on what happened and what it means. On the ground, the view of the situation is grim.  Citizens have stated that they believe the Israeli government and the Assad regime are in fact in collaboration, trying to sway the people’s aggression away from Assad. Whether or not this is true, the strategy is clearly not working, as the people have remained as hostile as ever.

On the other hand, Israel has expressed the opinion that it is operating as the final line of defense between terror organization Hezbollah and the rest of the world. Syria has in the past openly supported Hezbollah, arming them with Russian made weapons and supporting them in other logistical manners. The primary fear is that Hezbollah will be supplied with chemical weapons, and there is some significant possibility that they have already acquired and used chemical weapons on a small scale, according to some citizen accounts.

The international community has responded with a dizzying array of reactions, from Russia and Iran’s anger and calls for accountability to the U.S. statement in support of the Israeli decision. While it seems currently unlikely that there will be any sort of a violent reaction, this event may be the catalyst for international intervention in the Syrian civil war. The event has brought renewed calls to aid the Free Syrian Army and for the establishment of a no fly zone, which were previously thought to be too dangerous.

Whatever the final impacts, it is clear that the civil war is coming to a turn. The international community has been paying careful attention, and seems to be coming to the edge of an ultimatum.

WE

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Fire From the Sky: What Israel's Syrian Strike Means to the World


The Israeli government has long been one of the boldest and most proactive in the world. Surrounded by countries that are ideologically their opposites, and frequently opposed to the very existence of the Israel state, it is easy to understand their tension. Their most recent military activity, however, has fallen under a different sort of scrutiny than the usual. On Wednesday, January 30th, Israeli fighter jets roared over Syrian airspace and launched rockets at a target. What exactly that target was is now a subject of international debate with Syria claiming it was a research facility and Israel (backed by the United States) claiming it was a shipment of ground to air missiles headed for the Syrian backed terror organization Hezbollah.

                But why should anybody else care what exactly the target was? And what do the people on the ground believe? This will be explored in the following series of articles concerning the impacts of the Israeli Strike.

With Assad feeling extraordinary pressure as the Syrian Free army makes increased progress, it does not seem so far-fetched that Assad would welcome even a violent diversion. He has made calls to the people to rally against Israel, and to put down their anti-government arms. Whether or not this is true, the situation has also revealed much about the Syrian position. Their response has been a protest against the “Zionist – US collaboration”, with promises of support from Iran and Hezbollah. They, Russia and the Arab League are calling it an unprovoked attack and a violation of both Syrian sovereignty and the 1971 disengagement between the two powers (though this has been violated on both sides repeatedly). It does not seem likely, however, at the moment, that there will be a violent reaction to the strike, even with its allies.

WE